![]() ![]() ![]() Cet article montre au contraire qu’avant la fin des années 1880, le paradigme pour déterminer les limites constitutionnelles à la régulation du monde économique par la puissance publique était fort différent. Pour eux, cette approche du problème est la tradition dominante en histoire constitutionnelle, datant de l’ère jacksonienne au moins. Pour les plupart des historiens et juristes aujourd’hui, le problème est de trouver le point d’équilibre entre liberté économique et droit de propriété d’une part, et la puissance de l’État d’autre part. Un des sujets récurrents de la politique américaine pendant l’Âge doré portait sur les limites à la régulation de l’économie par l’État. Waite in 1888, the Supreme Court would rather steadfastly cling to the traditional doctrine than promote this new interpretation. But at least until the death of Chief Justice Morrison R. This was the result of the persistent efforts of lawyers for the corporate elite, who aimed to produced three changes: a tendency to equate regulation of business with confiscation of property a trend toward expanding the constitutional rights afforded to corporations and a reversal of the rule that economic regulation should be presumed valid. Only at the very end of the nineteenth century did this interpretation give way to a new one, raising entrepreneurial liberty to preferred status under the Constitution. Furthermore, it consistently held that, because state economic regulations were an expression of popular sovereignty and rights of the community, they should be presumed to be valid. The Supreme Court in its first century treated business regulation as a matter of balancing entrepreneurial liberty against the rights of the community. On the contrary this paper shows that prior to the late 1880s the paradigm for determining the constitution’s limits on government regulation of business was actually quite different. Most of today’s scholars treat it as a matter of balancing economic liberty or property rights against government power, and maintain that this balancing formula represents the predominant tradition in constitutional history, dating at least as far back as the Jacksonian era. One issue that permeated Gilded Age politics asks to what extent the United States Constitution places a limit on government regulation of business. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |